| Title Manuscript |
|
| REVIEW CRITERIA |
QUESTIONS |
Rating(Underline the rating) |
|
1.PRESENTATION
Positive responses for these questions represent high presentation ratings. Negative responses forthesequestions represent low presentation ratings.
|
•Does the article have a logic ;structure?
•Is the article clearly written?
•Is the article correctly written (from the grammar point of view )?
•Does the article present in an appropriate way, the terminology for its area of interest?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2. CONTENT: In this section, there are ten elements to be evaluated. These are presented below. Positive |
| 2.1. Title |
•Does the title clearly express the content of the article? |
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.2. Abstract |
• Is the abstract sufficiently informative?
• Does the abstract describe the research and the results?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.3. Introduction |
• Does the introduction correctly highlight the current concerns in the area ?
• Does the introduction specify the research objectives?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.4 Methodology |
• Are the methods used clearly explained?
• Are the methods used validated / recognized?
• Are the data and statistics used reliable?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.5 Results |
• Are the results clearly presented?
• Do the results sufficiently avoid misinterpretation?
• Do the results sufficiently avoid assumptions and speculations?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.6. Discussion |
• Are all relevant connections with others work/ research declared?
• Is the literature used in support of research ufficiently comprehensive and current?
• Do the discussion sufficiently avoid too general or biased information?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.7. Conclusions |
• Are the conclusions correctly / logically explained?
• Do the conclusions sufficiently avoid misinterpretation?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.8. Bibliography |
• Do the bibliography reflect the latest Work / research in the considered area?
• Are the references properly indexed and recorded in the bibliography?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.8 Tables |
• Do the tables correctly indicate the measuring units and the source?
• Are the tables correctly named and numbered?
• Are the data presented in tables correctly valued and interpreted in the article?
• Are the tables well proportioned and aesthetically placed in the article?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.9. Graphs and figures |
• Do the graphs and figures properly illustrate the discussed subject?
• Do the graphs and figures correctly indicate the measuringunits and the source?
• Are the graphs and figures correctly named and numbered?
• Are the data presented in graphs and figures correctly valued and
Interpreted in the article?
•Are the graphs and figures well proportioned and aesthetically placed in the article?
|
Poor
Improvements
Average
Good
Excellent
|
| 2.10. PLAGIARISM |
•If an article (or parts from an article) is suspected to be a substantial copy of
an earlier work, the article is rejected. |
Accepted
Rejected
|